Ryzen 7 3700X + GTX 1650: bottleneck check
Balanced at 1440p.
Well matched at 1440p. The GTX 1650 is the slightly busier part, by about 13%.
By resolution
| Resolution | Limiting part | Severity | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | GPU | 3% | balanced |
| 1440p | GPU | 13% | balanced |
| 4K | GPU | 34% | GPU-bound (normal) |
The GTX 1650 is the limiting part at every resolution, which is the healthy direction, and the gap is small enough that neither part is wasted. Upgrade the GPU first when you want more frames.
Specifications
| Cores / threads | 8 / 16 |
|---|---|
| Max boost | 4.4 GHz |
| Socket | AM4 |
| Power used for the PSU estimate | 65 W not confirmed against a manufacturer page |
| Released | 2019 |
| Gaming index | 52 / 100 |
| Multi-core index | 50 / 100 |
| VRAM | 4 GB |
|---|---|
| Board power | 75 W |
| Released | 2019 |
| 1080p index | 12.9 / 100 |
| 1440p index | 9 / 100 |
| 4K index | 6.3 / 100 |
Power supply
The GTX 1650 measured 64 W average while gaming (66 W peak, TechPowerUp). With the Ryzen 7 3700X at a power figure of 65 W and about 75 W for the rest of the system, the sustained load is about 204 W. A 450 W unit is the safe choice. Details on the GTX 1650 PSU page or try other pairs in the PSU calculator.
Upgrade paths
CPUs that remove the bottleneck
AM4Cards that use the Ryzen 7 3700X fully
Best CPU for the GTX 1650 Best GPU for the Ryzen 7 3700X GTX 1650 PSU requirements
Same CPU, other cards
AllSame card, other CPUs
AllIndexes are relative estimates aggregated from published reviews; real results vary by game, settings, memory speed and drivers. Methodology.